Parents outraged over double doses of H1N1 vaccine for kids

Editor:
The Public Health Agency of Canada is not Health Canada – Think about that for a moment.
Now start asking questions.
I’ll give you a hint – United Nations.
.
Parents outraged, but expert says don’t worry about H1N1 double doses for kids

By Pat Hewitt (CP) – 14 hours ago

TORONTO — Families in several provinces were expressing outrage and concern Tuesday after they said their children got double the recommended dose of the H1N1 vaccine, but at least one medical expert said there’s little need for concern.

Parents in Ontario, Manitoba and British Columbia have reported that their children received the amount in the adult dose instead of the pediatric dose of the swine flu shot.

The Public Health Agency of Canada has received reports of the wrong dose being given out to children but cannot provide exact figures, said spokeswoman Nadia Mostafa, who referred the question to provincial health ministries.

The agency’s guidelines call for adults to receive 0.5 ml in a single shot of the adjuvanted vaccine. The recommendation for children between six months of age to nine years is two half doses at least three weeks apart.

A stressed-out father in Delta, B.C., urged parents to check the dose themselves before their children get the shot. Jeevan Tauro said his three-year-old daughter and 17-month-old son were given the 0.5 ml dose at a Burnaby walk-in clinic Nov. 3.

In a telephone interview from his home Tuesday, Tauro said he asked the doctor if they should return to the clinic three weeks later to get the second half of the flu shot, but the doctor told him not to.

The doctor said there was only one shot and no subsequent vaccination, “so that raised my doubts (as to) what he had actually done,” said Tauro.

The receptionist told him his children had received the full adult dose, he said.

Tauro said his son Ruhin developed a fever the next day, and suffered a seizure four days later and was rushed to hospital. He said a pediatrician told him two days later that Ruhin’s high fever was related to the flu shot and that the fever had caused the seizure.

Canadian Press

Advertisements

Is the H1N1 Swine Flu a Hoax? – Dr. Arlene King

Dr. Arlene KingEditor: Trust this woman at your own Risk! Notice she is not with Health Canada.

Dr Arlene King, Director, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OK9, Canada

attended

19 October 2007
WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland
INITIATIVE FOR VACCINE RESEARCH (IVR) & GLOBAL INFLUENZA PROGRAM (GIP)

Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals
World Health Organization

All populations in all countries are expected to be susceptible to infection with a pandemic influenza virus. (why would they say that?)

Progress since May 2006 in implementing GAP strategies
Presentations and discussions held during the meeting served to review activities contributing to the implementation of the GAP.
Major progress has been made by the vaccine industry in developing H5N1 vaccine formulations, which will allow substantial antigen sparing in case of a pandemic. Indeed, three multinationals have shown appropriate immunogenicity of vaccine candidates containing as little as 3.8 to 7.5 ug HA, formulated with proprietary adjuvants.

The Group agreed upon the following key issues:
1) The overarching goal of the GAP to increase influenza vaccine production needs can be
characterized by several concurring issues: a) development of creative financial strategies; b) building a strong marketing campaign; c) relying on lessons learned from previous vaccine-preventable disease control, elimination, or eradication campaigns, i.e. polio; and d) incorporating lateral thinking to leverage sister UN organizations and partners such as the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and others. In particular, GAVI should be approached as a source of financial assistance. In addition, the establishment of a financing mechanism such as the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Revolving Fund should be explored as a solution to reduce seasonal influenza vaccine prices.
2) The GAP business plan provides a global framework for increasing vaccine production capacity for influenza vaccines. Implementation of the GAP should also result in strengthening of surveillance, as well as providing an opportunity for improving the performance of national immunization programmes.
Indeed, it may improve the world’s ability to conduct mass vaccination campaigns and represents an opportunity to strengthen vaccine regulatory systems.
As the kind of strategy contained in the GAP business plan has never been pursued, the Group noted that there were obvious risks. A major risk factor is the underlying assumption that there will in fact be a pandemic. If there is not a pandemic within the next five years, there may be loss of interest and
political awareness, and other public health needs may shift investment away from pandemic
influenza. Therefore, it is critical to identify the best possible strategy to maintain political commitment
and WHO is working with partners (UNICEF) and donors to mitigate this risk. The Advisory Group appreciated that the business plan was developed by independent consultants following discussions with country representatives and other stakeholders to achieve buy-in by the international community, and to prevent the GAP from being considered a bureaucrat-driven solution.
3) In the context of GAP approaches 2 and 3, there is a need to develop reproducible assays to
evaluate immunogenicity of influenza vaccines and to establish adequate correlates of protection. The efficacy of potential cross-reactive vaccine candidates to induce broad-spectrum protection should continue to be addressed in a critical manner. Stockpiling of potential H5N1 viruses should be assessed with caution; use of this may be justified in the absence of optimally matched and approved vaccine during the early phases of an influenza pandemic. WHO, Member States, and other stakeholders are currently establishing criteria, guidelines for use, maintenance issues, operational, and ethical issues of a WHO international influenza pandemic vaccine stockpile

From a marketing and financial perspective, the right engine to achieve this plan has to be selected based on a financial perspective. It will be critical to choose the right channel, which may include hosting the GAP under the umbrella of the implementation of international health regulations, as a global health security issue, or under health system strengthening. The business plan should work towards alignment with other organizations, harmonization of strategies with donors and maintenance of commitment of stakeholders/donors to avoid donor fatigue.

The Advisory Group suggested focusing on the following priorities over the coming months:
1) The main priorities for WHO for the year 2008 should be to choose the appropriate spin to be placed on the business plan in association with the right marketing strategy. WHO also needs to establish a detailed operational plan and to define financial resources i.e. donors, countries, and other stakeholders. Leveraging the GAP with twin programmes from sister agencies or other stakeholders, as well as making sure that the need for increasing influenza vaccine production capacity is addressed in the political arena are key priorities.
2) Additional priorities include:
– Maintaining global commitment through information, communication, and educational activities.
Addressing any potential liability issues associated with the business plan.

The Canadian govt. has shielded the manufacturers from liability in the case of side affects or death from the vaccine. Why?

It certainly looks like  a scam folks! Before you take the vaccine do your own research.

Full article

Also see-

IBM Knew About Pandemic in 2006

WHO memos 1972 explains how to turn vaccines into a means of killing

Editor:

Think and do your research before you accept any vaccine. Your life – Your responsibility!

Two key memorandums from WHO, discovered by Patrick Jordan, prove WHO has intentionally created the three-shot killer vaccine that people in the USA and other countries could soon be forced to take.

featured stories   WHO memos 1972 explains how to turn vaccines into a means of killing

1972 WHO Bulletin 47, No 2 Memordanda #1 and #2 Virus-associated immunopathology:

Animal models and implications for human disease * technically outline the ability to create biological weapons in the form of vaccines that:

1) First totally disable the Immune System.

2) Load every cell of the Victim’s body up with Infection.

3) Switch the Immune System on causing the host to kill themselves in a Cytokine Storm.

One, Two, Three, Dead.

These WHO Memorandas describe the three-stage impact of the three “shots” many people will be forced to take this fall to allegedly treat a virus that WHO also helped create and release.

This is a crucial piece of evidence of WHO’s long-term genocidal intentions that could stand in any court of law because these memorandums give the best and fullest explanation WHO’s and affiliated labs (such as the CDC) current activities, such as their patenting of the most lethal bird flu viruses, their sending that virus to Baxter’s subsidiary in Austria, which weaponised it and sent out 72 kilos to 16 labs in four countries almost triggering a global pandemic.

For every crime, there needs to be motive, an indication that it was deliberate, planned. The WHO memorandums provide the evidence of just that deliberate, long-term planning to kill people by weakening their immune system by use of the first vaccine, injecting a live virus into their body by a second, and creating a cytokine storm using squalene in a third.

Download the WHO Memoranda on:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?iid=169484

Scroll down until you find:

Memoranda

Inforwars

WHO memos 1972 explains how to turn vaccines into a means of killing

Is the H1N1 Flu Vaccine Safe?

Watch the video before you say yes to the H1N1 or any other vaccine.

 

H1N1 Kills 13 YR. Old Boy in Toronto

Editor:

A tragic event indeed and we wish his family all the best during this time

I hope this video helps shed some light on what may have happened to cause this young mans death.

The media is using this young man’s death to ramp up the fear factor. Think before you take the shot.

In the event you or a  loved one suffers negative side affects from the vaccine be aware the govt. is shielding the vaccine companies from being held responsible.

Think about that!

Do your research.

Mass Vaccination Begins in Canada

Editor:

Is it just a coincidence this pandemic showed up now? Was it orchestrated? How did Baxter know to apply for a patent a year before the pandemic?
Dr Arlene King, Director, Public Health Agency of Canada attended the meeting at the WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland (notice she is not with Health Canada) She is however in charge of the pandemic in Ontario. It all smells and it smell bad!

19 October 2007
WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland

As the kind of strategy contained in the GAP business plan has never been pursued, the Group noted
that there were obvious risks. A major risk factor is the underlying assumption that there will in fact be
a pandemic. If there is not a pandemic within the next five years, there may be loss of interest and
political awareness, and other public health needs may shift investment away from pandemic
influenza. Therefore, it is critical to identify the best possible strategy to maintain political commitment
and WHO is working with partners (UNICEF) and donors to mitigate this risk. The Advisory Group
appreciated that the business plan was developed by independent consultants following discussions
with country representatives and other stakeholders to achieve buy-in by the international community,
and to prevent the GAP from being considered a bureaucrat-driven solution

The Advisory Group suggested focusing on the following priorities over the coming months:
1) The main priorities for WHO for the year 2008 should be to choose the appropriate spin to be
placed on the business plan in association with the right marketing strategy.

http://whqlibdoc.who.int/HQ/2008/WHO_IVB_08.10_eng.pdf

The UN is the eugenics movement. I say this after years of research.

Do your own research before you accept the vaccine for yourself or your children.

Interesting times ahead!

Obama Declares Swine Flu Emergency

Eugenics in action
Take the shot at your own risk!

Obama Declares Swine Flu a National Emergency

New York Times – Jackie Calmes, Donald G. McNeil Jr – ‎32 minutes ago‎
WASHINGTON — President Obama has declared the swine flu outbreak a national emergency, allowing hospitals and

Obama declares national emergency as US swine flu deaths hit 1000

guardian.co.uk – ‎31 minutes ago‎
President Barack Obama has declared a national emergency in America, it was announced yesterday, as swine flu deaths reached 1000.

Obama declares swine flu a national emergency

The Associated Press – Philip Elliott – ‎44 minutes ago‎
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama declared the swine flu outbreak a national emergency, giving his health chief the power to let hospitals move emergency